The JBlog

The JBlog

Share this post

The JBlog
The JBlog
Bryant Rhoades | Unshackled #1 | Opinion Without Evidence Is Called Prejudice

Bryant Rhoades | Unshackled #1 | Opinion Without Evidence Is Called Prejudice

What would stop the government from doing a DNA test for someone who is claiming to be innocent?

Imran Siddiqui's avatar
Imran Siddiqui
Oct 05, 2022
∙ Paid
3

Share this post

The JBlog
The JBlog
Bryant Rhoades | Unshackled #1 | Opinion Without Evidence Is Called Prejudice
Share

5 October 2022 | Imran Siddiqui | Justice News | Washington D.C.

Bryant Rhoades of Mercer County Ohio was never at the crime scene, and yet he's serving a life sentence without any possibility of parole for double murders that he says he did not commit. Bryant has maintained his innocence for over a decade now and he says they "buried me alive".

The JBlog is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

But why didn't his public pretender-defender use Bryant's alibi witness as evidence to try and save him? "What evidence did the prosecutor have to try and kill me?. Bryant asked me over the phone. "Why is the prosecutor suppressing exculpatory evidence?" He says, "they deny me the DNA evidence because they know it will prove me 100 percent innocent".

Why do prosecutors continue to try and consistently succeed at convicting innocent people in America? - nothing but silence -

One answer is, they don't know. So why would …

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Justice News
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share